[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16863137#comment-16863137
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-22564:
-----------------------------------
WIth the patch for HBASE-22577 in place, we can get the same performance.
{noformat}
./bin/hbase pe --presplit=10 --nomapred --rows=2000000 randomWrite 10
&>test.log </dev/null &
{noformat}
Test several times to get the best result for each branch
master
{noformat}
2019-06-13 22:34:58,623 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation:
[RandomWriteTest] Summary of timings (ms): [53784, 53411, 52768, 51903, 53248,
53368, 53204, 53318, 53443, 53425]
2019-06-13 22:34:58,717 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation:
[RandomWriteTest duration ] Min: 51903ms Max: 53784ms Avg: 53187ms
2019-06-13 22:34:58,717 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: [ Avg latency
(us)] 26
2019-06-13 22:34:58,717 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: [ Avg
TPS/QPS] 376063 row per second
{noformat}
HBASE-21512
{noformat}
2019-06-13 22:18:11,039 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation:
[RandomWriteTest] Summary of timings (ms): [48765, 50178, 50147, 50072, 49698,
49768, 50099, 49815, 50084, 50164]
2019-06-13 22:18:11,147 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation:
[RandomWriteTest duration ] Min: 48765ms Max: 50178ms Avg: 49879ms
2019-06-13 22:18:11,147 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: [ Avg latency
(us)] 24
2019-06-13 22:18:11,147 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: [ Avg
TPS/QPS] 400998 row per second
{noformat}
We can even do better.
So finally let me also do a YCSB test to finish this.
> Compare performance number with old sync client implementation
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-22564
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22564
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: flamegraph.svg
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
