[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16890602#comment-16890602
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-22648:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2
        [build #2098 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/2098/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/2098//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/2098//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/2098//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> Snapshot TTL
> ------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-22648
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22648
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: snapshots
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Viraj Jasani
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-22648-master-v2.patch, 
> HBASE-22648-master-v3.patch, HBASE-22648-master-v4.patch, 
> HBASE-22648-master-v5.patch, HBASE-22648-master-v6.patch, 
> HBASE-22648-master-v8.patch, HBASE-22648-master.patch, Screen Shot 2019-07-10 
> at 8.49.13 PM.png, Screen Shot 2019-07-10 at 8.52.30 PM.png, Screen Shot 
> 2019-07-10 at 9.06.36 PM.png, Screen Shot 2019-07-16 at 11.06.03 AM.png
>
>
> Snapshots have a lifecycle that is independent from the table from which they 
> are created. Although data in a table may be stored with TTL the data files 
> containing them become frozen by the snapshot. Space consumed by expired 
> cells will not be reclaimed by normal table housekeeping like compaction. 
> While this is expected it can be inconvenient at scale. When many snapshots 
> are under management and the data in various tables is expired by TTL some 
> notion of optional TTL (and optional default TTL) for snapshots could be 
> useful. It will help prevent the accumulation of junk files by automatically 
> dropping the snapshot after the assigned TTL, making their data files 
> eligible for cleaning. More comprehensive snapshot lifecycle management may 
> be considered in the future but this one case is expected to be immediately 
> useful given TTls on data are commonly applied for similar convenience. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to