[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16980993#comment-16980993
 ] 

Viraj Jasani commented on HBASE-23279:
--------------------------------------

{quote}Patch looks good generally. Are the changes for the tests necessary 
(keeping NONE as encoding) required to have them pass? That would be a bit 
scary.
{quote}
This is true. We need those changes and might be problematic. btw 
TestMobCompactor doesn't require NONE for all tests to pass but only for one 
test: testMinorCompaction(), no of mob file counts(for family1 CF: L324) change 
after compaction. May be I should update this specific test case with updated 
no of file counts after compaction? *This test fails for ROW_INDEX_V1 and 
FAST_DIFF encodings.*

TestHFileWriterV3 changes might need more attention since we get this 
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException while copying from ByteBuffer to array. 

 
{code:java}
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptionjava.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
 at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method) at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.ByteBufferUtils.copyFromBufferToArray(ByteBufferUtils.java:1149)
 at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.nio.SingleByteBuff.get(SingleByteBuff.java:216) at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.nio.SingleByteBuff.get(SingleByteBuff.java:228) at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.TestHFileWriterV3.writeDataAndReadFromHFile(TestHFileWriterV3.java:257)
 at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.TestHFileWriterV3.testHFileFormatV3Internals(TestHFileWriterV3.java:110)
 at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.TestHFileWriterV3.testHFileFormatV3(TestHFileWriterV3.java:103){code}
 

However, *the above test fails for all encodings and pass only for NONE.*

TestGetClosestAtOrBefore can be ignored as per previous discussions and also 
meta entries don't seem to have any issues locally.

 
{quote}Also the size difference is unexpectedly high... I guess it depends on 
the size of the keys relative to the total size of the Cells, in my tests I've 
seen about 3%. I tested with Phoenix
{quote}
I tested with LTT: bin/hbase ltt -tn t1 -write 1:10:300 -num_keys 999999 
-families cf1

Typical RowKey length is ~38 with avg 4 cells.

An example:
{code:java}
 ffff9979c9699b51cb7cda98e5bf84c2-616604                     column=cf3:0, 
timestamp=1574530970591, value=6\xDA\xC1\xB0\xA8\xA6\xBF* _\xA5!\x9A            
                                                                                
   
 ffff9979c9699b51cb7cda98e5bf84c2-616604                     column=cf3:1, 
timestamp=1574530970600, value=I\xFB\xBB\xB0H\xF2\x9Eo\x16                      
                                                                                
   
 ffff9979c9699b51cb7cda98e5bf84c2-616604                     
column=cf3:increment, timestamp=1574530970613, 
value=\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\x87\xE9\xDE\x05                                          
                                                  
 ffff9979c9699b51cb7cda98e5bf84c2-616604                     
column=cf3:mutate_info, timestamp=1574530970613, value=                         
                                                                                
                 
{code}

> Switch default block encoding to ROW_INDEX_V1
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-23279
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23279
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Wish
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>            Assignee: Viraj Jasani
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-23279.master.000.patch, 
> HBASE-23279.master.001.patch, HBASE-23279.master.002.patch, 
> HBASE-23279.master.003.patch
>
>
> Currently we set both block encoding and compression to NONE.
> ROW_INDEX_V1 has many advantages and (almost) no disadvantages (the hfiles 
> are slightly larger about 3% or so). I think that would a better default than 
> NONE.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to