[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17032555#comment-17032555
 ] 

HBase QA commented on HBASE-23779:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  7s{color} 
| {color:red} HBASE-23779 does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See 
https://yetus.apache.org/documentation/in-progress/precommit-patchnames for 
help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-23779 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12992918/addendum2.patch |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1124/console |
| versions | git=2.17.1 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.11.1 https://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Up the default fork count to make builds complete faster; make count relative 
> to CPU count
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-23779
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23779
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: test
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: addendum2.patch, test_yetus_934.0.patch
>
>
> Tests take a long time. Our fork count running all tests are conservative -- 
> 1 (small) for first part and 5 for second part (medium and large). Rather 
> than hardcoding we should set the fork count to be relative to machine size. 
> Suggestion here is 0.75C where C is CPU count. This ups the CPU use on my box.
> Looking up at jenkins, it seems like the boxes are 24 cores... at least going 
> by my random survey. The load reported on a few seems low though this not 
> representative (looking at machine/uptime).
> More parallelism willl probably mean more test failure. Let me take a look 
> see.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to