[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17083220#comment-17083220
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-24158:
--------------------------------
Results for branch master
[build #1698 on
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1698/]: (/)
*{color:green}+1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1698/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1698/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1698/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1698/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> [Flakey Tests] TestAsyncTableGetMultiThreaded
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-24158
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24158
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael Stack
> Assignee: Michael Stack
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-HBASE-24158-Flakey-Tests-TestAsyncTableGetMultiThrea.patch
>
>
> I've already cut down the number of threads used by this test but it failed
> in nightly last night unable to close out its xml and locally it failed too
> in a run overnight. I ran it under harness and it seems well-behaved. It
> doesn't use much memory -- 700MB -- and thread counts are usual (~450). It
> does use near 100% CPU which is a little unusual. Otherwise, looks fine.
> Let me keep an eye on it. Could down the thread count more and use less
> processes... this makes it use less CPU. There does seems a bunch of overlap
> with tests done elsewhere.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
