[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17085336#comment-17085336
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-24158:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2.2
        [build #839 on 
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/839/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/839//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/839//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.2/839//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> [Flakey Tests] TestAsyncTableGetMultiThreaded
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-24158
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24158
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael Stack
>            Assignee: Michael Stack
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0, 2.2.5
>
>         Attachments: 
> 0001-HBASE-24158-Flakey-Tests-TestAsyncTableGetMultiThrea.addendum.patch, 
> 0001-HBASE-24158-Flakey-Tests-TestAsyncTableGetMultiThrea.patch
>
>
> I've already cut down the number of threads used by this test but it failed 
> in nightly last night unable to close out its xml and locally it failed too 
> in a run overnight. I ran it under harness and it seems well-behaved. It 
> doesn't use much memory -- 700MB -- and thread counts are usual (~450).  It 
> does use near 100% CPU which is a little unusual. Otherwise, looks fine.
> Let me keep an eye on it. Could down the thread count more and use less 
> processes... this makes it use less CPU. There does seems a bunch of overlap 
> with tests done elsewhere.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to