[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17113067#comment-17113067
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-11288:
-----------------------------------
{quote}
If that is something you need we could still have root table but not expose the
region api (possibly like we already do for mutations) to them just the api you
described? Also I'm wondering if we don't expose the scan apis at all then do
we plan to have hbck for root where it is located (eg in the master)?
{quote}
At least we have to provide an API to fecth all the content in root table, as
the cache service needs it. So for HBCK it could also uses this API. But this
API will not be part of the client facing API, for client they just need a
simple locateMeta method.
> Splittable Meta
> ---------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11288
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11288
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Components: meta
> Reporter: Francis Christopher Liu
> Assignee: Francis Christopher Liu
> Priority: Major
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
