[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17144415#comment-17144415
]
Josh Elser commented on HBASE-24629:
------------------------------------
Definitely not intentional to have testapidocs in client tarball. I did notice
in 2.2 that we have all client jars in the client tarball. I _thought_ the goal
was to just have the shaded-client jars present in it (especially that the
shell is smart enough to use 'em). That might be something else we can purge.
I seem to recall (but am maybe inventing) that since the client-tarball was
net-new, we didn't have any obligation to give people the old non-shaded
artifacts (e.g. hbase-client, hbase-common), and instead opt-in folks to the
shaded clients to try to push adoption.
> Review client binary size
> -------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-24629
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24629
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: community
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0
> Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
> Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
> Priority: Major
>
> Discussion on 2.3.0RC0 noted that the client tarball is larger than the
> default tarball. Docs were pointed out as the culprit. Lets dig deeper and
> see what's going on.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
