[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17224097#comment-17224097
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-24859:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-1
        [build #49 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/49/]:
 (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/49//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk7 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk7 
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/49//JDK7_Nightly_Build_Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-1/49//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]




(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


> Optimize in-memory representation of mapreduce TableSplit objects
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-24859
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24859
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: mapreduce
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.3.3, 1.7.0, 2.4.0, 2.2.7
>            Reporter: Sandeep Pal
>            Assignee: Sandeep Pal
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>         Attachments: Screen Shot 2020-08-26 at 8.44.34 AM.png, hbase-24859.png
>
>
> It has been observed that when the table has too many regions, MR jobs 
> consume a lot of memory in the client. This is because we keep the region 
> level information in memory and the memory heavy object is TableSplit because 
> of the Scan object as a part of it.
> However, it looks like the TableInputFormat for single table doesn't need to 
> store the scan object in the TableSplit because we do not use it and all the 
> splits are expected to have the exact same scan object. In TableInputFormat 
> we use the scan object directly from the MR conf.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to