[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17226321#comment-17226321
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-24859:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-2
[build #93 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/93/]:
(/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/93/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/93/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/93/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/93/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> Optimize in-memory representation of mapreduce TableSplit objects
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-24859
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24859
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: mapreduce
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.3.3, 1.7.0, 2.4.0, 2.2.7
> Reporter: Sandeep Pal
> Assignee: Sandeep Pal
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 1.7.0, 2.4.0, 2.2.7, 2.3.4
>
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2020-08-26 at 8.44.34 AM.png, hbase-24859.png
>
>
> It has been observed that when the table has too many regions, MR jobs
> consume a lot of memory in the client. This is because we keep the region
> level information in memory and the memory heavy object is TableSplit because
> of the Scan object as a part of it.
> However, it looks like the TableInputFormat for single table doesn't need to
> store the scan object in the TableSplit because we do not use it and all the
> splits are expected to have the exact same scan object. In TableInputFormat
> we use the scan object directly from the MR conf.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
