Apache9 commented on pull request #3666: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/3666#issuecomment-916150650
> Makes sense and gives extensibility. I realised StoreFileTracker is tightened to stores, so we may also choose to persist tracker config on CF descriptor. For now, am putting into table, though, as it gives the chance for operators to override it at CF level. Let me know if you feel we should persist at CF descriptor, @Apache9 . For me, I think table level is enough. You can not creating a single CF without table. And when adding new CF to an existing table, it will inherit the configurations from table descriptor, unless you specify the configurations in the CF descriptor. It will not be effected by cluster level configurations. The goal here is to prevent data loss when we have different configurations at master or region server side, and also when we change the cluster level default different configurations. Table level is enough~ WDYT? @wchevreuil Thanks. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
