[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17454724#comment-17454724
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-26487:
-----------------------------------

I've done the first test, there is no big differences between old and the new 
implementations on writing performance.

I've both run PE 3 times.

For the old implementation, the result
{noformat}
Round 1: latency 158us, qps 31453
Round 2: latency 159us, qps 31353
Round 3: latency 162us, qps 30084
Avg: latency 159.7us, qps 30963.3
{noformat}

For the new implementation, the result
{noformat}
Round 1: latency 150us, qps 33025
Round 2: latency 146us, qps 32949
Round 3: latency 150us, qps 33987
Avg: latency 148.7us, qps 33320.3
{noformat}

The difference on latency and qps is about 7%, no very big, and the new 
implementation is a bit faster

> Run some tests to verify the new region replication framework
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-26487
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26487
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: integration tests, test
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>
> Make sure there is no big bugs before merging back.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to