[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17510689#comment-17510689
]
Viraj Jasani commented on HBASE-23279:
--------------------------------------
{quote}ROW_INDEX_V1 may not be a good default for tables in general.
{quote}
+1, for sure it makes more sense for meta reads. I have also not run a full
build for quite a long time but I am sure this behaviour would introduce many
test failures even today and it might not be useful for all usecases as Andrew
mentioned above.
[~larsh] shall we close this Jira? WDYT?
> Switch default block encoding to ROW_INDEX_V1
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-23279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23279
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.3.0
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Assignee: Viraj Jasani
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HBASE-23279.master.000.patch,
> HBASE-23279.master.001.patch, HBASE-23279.master.002.patch,
> HBASE-23279.master.003.patch, HBASE-23279.master.004.patch,
> HBASE-23279.master.005.patch
>
>
> Currently we set both block encoding and compression to NONE.
> ROW_INDEX_V1 has many advantages and (almost) no disadvantages (the hfiles
> are slightly larger about 3% or so). I think that would a better default than
> NONE.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
