[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13399212#comment-13399212
 ] 

Flavio Junqueira commented on HBASE-2315:
-----------------------------------------

Hi Ted, I don't fully understand what HBASE-5699 is proposing. It mixes 
parallel writes and HDFS. In my perspective, we are able to perform efficient 
parallel writes out of the box and we can benefit from an interface that 
exposes enough information for us to separate the edits into different logs 
(e.g., one per region). If the outcome of HBASE-5699 is a set of changes to the 
interface that allow this to happen, then we could benefit from it. For a first 
cut of this issue, I don't think we need parallel writes, though, so I would 
say it is not dependent, but I'd be happy to hear a different opinion.   
                
> BookKeeper for write-ahead logging
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2315
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2315
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: Flavio Junqueira
>         Attachments: HBASE-2315.patch, bookkeeperOverview.pdf, 
> zookeeper-dev-bookkeeper.jar
>
>
> BookKeeper, a contrib of the ZooKeeper project, is a fault tolerant and high 
> throughput write-ahead logging service. This issue provides an implementation 
> of write-ahead logging for hbase using BookKeeper. Apart from expected 
> throughput improvements, BookKeeper also has stronger durability guarantees 
> compared to the implementation currently used by hbase.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to