virajjasani commented on PR #5167: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5167#issuecomment-1505718931
Thank you @chrajeshbabu. It seems the changes make sense from the upgrade viewpoint. On the other hand, if this rare scenario were to happen on a healthy 2.x cluster, does this change make any difference? > All these manual steps are error prone and not required because during graceful shutdowns of cluster anyway meta won't be assigned to any server so allowing meta assignment to random server during init meta procedure is correct that is what happening with my patch. Returning false because just to log that meta table directory is not deleted. If this happens on 2.x cluster, what would now be different? Only that meta would be assigned on any random server, correct? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
