[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17788506#comment-17788506
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-28210:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2.5
        [build #438 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/438/]:
 (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/438/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/438/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/438/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/438/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> There could be holes in stack ids when loading procedures
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-28210
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28210
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: master, proc-v2
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.6.0, 2.4.18, 3.0.0-beta-1, 2.5.7
>
>
> Found this when implementing HBASE-28199, as after HBASE-28199 we will 
> suspend procedures a lot, so a missed scenario has been covered and it will 
> fail some UTs with corrupted procedures when loading.
> I think this issue should be fixed separately as it affects all active 
> branches.
> Let me try to implement a UT first.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to