[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17788507#comment-17788507
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-28210:
--------------------------------
Results for branch master
[build #949 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/949/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/949/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/949/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/949/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> There could be holes in stack ids when loading procedures
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-28210
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28210
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: master, proc-v2
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.6.0, 2.4.18, 3.0.0-beta-1, 2.5.7
>
>
> Found this when implementing HBASE-28199, as after HBASE-28199 we will
> suspend procedures a lot, so a missed scenario has been covered and it will
> fail some UTs with corrupted procedures when loading.
> I think this issue should be fixed separately as it affects all active
> branches.
> Let me try to implement a UT first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
