[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13420990#comment-13420990
]
Zhihong Ted Yu commented on HBASE-6429:
---------------------------------------
For filterRow(List<KeyValue> kvs):
{code}
+ this.filter.filterRow(kvs);
+ if (!kvs.isEmpty() && this.filter.filterRow()) {
+ kvs.clear();
+ }
{code}
Can we exchange the order of filterRow(kvs) and if statement ?
If this.filter.filterRow() returns true, we don't need to call filterRow(kvs).
Correct me if I am wrong.
> Filter with filterRow() returning true is incompatible with scan with limit
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6429
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6429
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: filters
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Jason Dai
> Attachments: hbase-6429-trunk.patch, hbase-6429_0_94_0.patch
>
>
> Currently if we scan with bot limit and a Filter with
> filterRow(List<KeyValue>) implemented, an IncompatibleFilterException will
> be thrown. The same exception should also be thrown if the filer has its
> filterRow() implemented.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
