NihalJain commented on PR #131: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase-thirdparty/pull/131#issuecomment-2758017042
> I am not sure about the name, but jetty12 wouldn't be great either. Yes hence thought to create env specific names. > I guess that importing two different relocated jetty versions is not something that we want support, so re-using the package name is fine Yes this is a fair concern. Although, we would not want to have shaded jetty9 in our classpath if with have jetty12-eeX, but I am afraid what if hadoop timeline service or something else brings it in indirectly.? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
