[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13488460#comment-13488460
]
stack commented on HBASE-7055:
------------------------------
[~sershe] On documentation, a section in the book would be cool but failing
that, a release note should describe what the feature does, why you would use
it and its configuration params (I'd think). It can be terse and expanded
later in the book but w/o such a thing, the code is often committed and just
forgotten (I looked at original JIRA and it has little by way of description.
I fixed the bad link in the README.txt. Thanks for pointing it out).
Refactor, a good idea I think, should be done in a new issue. Can cite the
posted rb (I'll try help out w/ a review now). I like the scheme you fellas
have for putting policy in table (rather than in a reloadable config. that is
for compaction only)
If the class names are confusing, lets fix them in refactor (same as 89fb
branch is not good enough reason preserving names that confound)
> port HBASE-6371 tier-based compaction from 0.89-fb to trunk
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7055
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Compaction
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
> Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-6371-squashed.patch, HBASE-6371-v2-squashed.patch,
> HBASE-6371-v3-refactor-only-squashed.patch
>
>
> There's divergence in the code :(
> See HBASE-6371 for details.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
