[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13493405#comment-13493405
]
Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-7055:
-----------------------------------------
I didn't do any targeted testing, just general run on one box (w/ multiple
RS-es). Not sure about the interplay with dynamic config, I'd assume if you
mine data for table R/W patterns, take it offline and apply config once you'd
be good for a long time w/better compactions. Cannot tell how much tweaking is
normal w/o running it in production for a long time.
If we make column config specific to columns, maybe it can be refreshed
separately from dynamic config JIRA xml file refresh. I haven't looked at the
column config code yet. Will create separate JIRA when I do, unless someone
does earlier.
> port HBASE-6371 tier-based compaction from 0.89-fb to trunk
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7055
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Compaction
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
> Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-6371-squashed.patch, HBASE-6371-v2-squashed.patch,
> HBASE-6371-v3-refactor-only-squashed.patch,
> HBASE-6371-v4-refactor-only-squashed.patch,
> HBASE-6371-v5-refactor-only-squashed.patch
>
>
> There's divergence in the code :(
> See HBASE-6371 for details.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
