[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526937#comment-13526937
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-7233:
------------------------------

bq. Will clients ever want a value in the mvccVersion?

No.  MVCC is server internals.

bq. In the replacement interface, we'll want to switch from encoding a 
ByteBuffer of KeyValue format bytes to a streaming interface where Cells are 
given to the encoder individually and a flush method is called when you want 
the encoded byte[] spit out. 

Streaming Interface sounds good.  Should we call these new base classes 
Encoder, Encoding, Context, etc..... i.e. drop the DataBlock prefix.  Hopefully 
DataBlockEncoder could inherit Encoder.
                
> Serializing KeyValues
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-7233
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7233
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: 7233.txt, 7233-v2.txt
>
>
> Undo KeyValue being a Writable.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to