[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13547290#comment-13547290
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6393:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12563812/HBASE-6393-v3.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3935//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Decouple audit event creation from storage in AccessController
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6393
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6393
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Brainstorming
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 0.96.0
>            Reporter: Marcelo Vanzin
>         Attachments: hbase-6393-v1.patch, HBASE-6393-v2.patch, 
> HBASE-6393-v3.patch
>
>
> Currently, AccessControler takes care of both generating audit events (by 
> performing access checks) and storing them (by creating a log message and 
> writing it to the AUDITLOG logger).
> This makes the logging system the only way to catch audit events. It means 
> that if someone wants to do something fancier (like writing these records to 
> a database somewhere), they need to hack through the logging system, and 
> parse the messages generated by AccessController, which is not optimal.
> The attached patch decouples generation and storage by introducing a new 
> interface, used by AccessController, to log the audit events. The current, 
> log-based storage is kept in place so that current users won't be affected by 
> the change.
> I'm filing this as an RFC at this point, so the patch is not totally clean; 
> it's on top of HBase 0.92 (which is easier for me to test) and doesn't have 
> any unit tests, for starters. But the changes should be very similar on trunk 
> - I don't remember changes in this particular area of the code between those 
> versions.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to