[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26794?focusedWorklogId=830495&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-830495
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HIVE-26794:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 02/Dec/22 01:52
Start Date: 02/Dec/22 01:52
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: dengzhhu653 commented on code in PR #3817:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/3817#discussion_r1037717738
##########
standalone-metastore/metastore-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/metastore/txn/TxnHandler.java:
##########
@@ -375,8 +375,13 @@ public void setConf(Configuration conf){
connPool = setupJdbcConnectionPool(conf, maxPoolSize);
}
if (connPoolMutex == null) {
- configurator.resetName("mutex");
- connPoolMutex = setupJdbcConnectionPool(conf, maxPoolSize);
+ // It's kind of a waste to create a fixed size connection pool as
same as the connPool and
+ // the connection pool used in ObjectStore, and the connection pool
is mostly used for MutexAPI that
+ // is primarily designed to provide coarse-grained mutex support to
maintenance tasks running inside
+ // the Metastore, we only use getConnection method to retrieve
connection from this pool,
+ // changing it to NoPoolConnectionPool will make Metastore more
scalable especially
+ // there is a leader in the warehouse.
Review Comment:
yea, I think I miss it.
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 830495)
Time Spent: 1h 20m (was: 1h 10m)
> Explore changing TxnHandler#connPoolMutex to NoPoolConnectionPool
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-26794
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26794
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Standalone Metastore
> Reporter: Zhihua Deng
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 1h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Instead of creating a fixed size connection pool for TxnHandler#MutexAPI, the
> pool can be assigned to NoPoolConnectionPool due to:
> * TxnHandler#MutexAPI is primarily designed to provide coarse-grained mutex
> support to maintenance tasks running inside the Metastore, these tasks are
> not user faced;
> * A fixed size connection pool as same as the pool used in ObjectStore is a
> waste for other non leaders in the warehouse;
> The NoPoolConnectionPool provides connection on demand, and
> TxnHandler#MutexAPI only uses getConnection method to fetch a connection from
> the pool, so it's doable to change the pool to NoPoolConnectionPool, this
> would make the HMS more scaleable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)