stevenzwu commented on code in PR #11041: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11041#discussion_r2807731497
########## format/view-spec.md: ########## @@ -82,9 +97,12 @@ Each version in `versions` is a struct with the following fields: | _required_ | `representations` | A list of [representations](#representations) for the view definition | | _optional_ | `default-catalog` | Catalog name to use when a reference in the SELECT does not contain a catalog | | _required_ | `default-namespace` | Namespace to use when a reference in the SELECT is a single identifier | +| _optional_ | `storage-table` | A [storage table identifier](#storage-table-identifier) of the storage table | Review Comment: > Is initially empty storage table would be easily distinguishable from recently refreshed but (happened to be) empty (as query retuned nothing) storage tables ? This seems straightforward to me. Empty table after refresh would still have `refresh-state` populated with at least `last-refresh-time` even if the `source-state` is empty. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
