mxm commented on code in PR #15150:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15150#discussion_r2980742218
##########
spark/v4.1/spark/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/SparkWriteConf.java:
##########
@@ -171,6 +172,26 @@ public int outputSpecId() {
return outputSpecId;
}
+ public int outputSortOrderId(SparkWriteRequirements writeRequirements) {
+ String explicitId =
+
confParser.stringConf().option(SparkWriteOptions.OUTPUT_SORT_ORDER_ID).parseOptional();
+
+ if (explicitId != null) {
+ int id = Integer.parseInt(explicitId);
+ Preconditions.checkArgument(
+ table.sortOrders().containsKey(id),
+ "Cannot use output sort order id %s because the table does not
contain a sort order with that id",
+ id);
+ return id;
+ }
+
+ if (writeRequirements.hasOrdering()) {
+ return table.sortOrder().orderId();
Review Comment:
Thanks! I'll do some more digging. It looks like Spark performs its own sort
optimizations which may be different from the original table sort order.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
