Probablism commented on issue #16502: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/16502#issuecomment-4828329751
Source suggests this is not required for correctness. The fix is in shared `arrow`, and the shared Arrow regression already covers the failing non-dictionary decimal/default path. Adding analogous Spark-side regressions to 3.5 and 4.0 would still be reasonable for coverage parity, since those modules use the same vectorized reader stack and currently only 4.1 has the Spark integration test. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
