Probablism commented on issue #16502: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/16502#issuecomment-4828339343
I don’t think this is needed for correctness since the fix is in shared `arrow` now, and the Arrow test already covers the non-dictionary decimal/default case. That said, adding the same Spark regression to 3.5 and 4.0 seems reasonable for coverage parity. Those versions use the same vectorized reader path, and right now only 4.1 has the Spark-level test. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
