akashmalbari commented on PR #18299: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18299#issuecomment-5932232962
@huaxingao Good point. I initially added the regression test in 4.1, where the issue was reproduced, and then added 4.2 during review. Since the fix is duplicated across all four Spark modules, the coverage should be consistent as well. I added the same test for Spark 3.5 and 4.0 in `e38a0b14c`. Each test verifies that `max(_row_id)` is not pushed down and that the fallback returns exactly `2L`. The focused tests pass across all four catalog configurations for both modules, and both Spotless checks pass. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
