yyanyy commented on a change in pull request #2096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2096#discussion_r560449979



##########
File path: api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/VersionedSchema.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.iceberg;
+
+import java.io.Serializable;
+import java.util.Objects;
+
+/**
+ * A wrapper around Schema to include its schema ID
+ */
+public class VersionedSchema implements Serializable {

Review comment:
       I mentioned this briefly in the PR description: 
   
   >The reason to not add ID directly into Schema is that currently schema 
creation is widely used as a convenient method for a lot of actions that don't 
involve a "real" table schema. 
   
   The main concern I had with adding schema ID is that it might be confusing 
to tell from the code base when a schema should have ID and when not. A schema 
only needs to have ID when it's really a table schema strictly associated with 
table metadata, but outside of that context, the ID is not useful in any "real" 
operation of the schema, especially considering that it's often used for 
conveniently mutate fields for things like projection. Maybe we should rename 
`VersionedSchema` to something like `TableSchema` to better reflect this? 




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to