danielcweeks edited a comment on pull request #1981: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/1981#issuecomment-765040351
~~So, the best I can follow, this looks good, but there's one issue I'm not clear on. If we're just expanding the projection to include possible matches (e.g. equality case), doesn't this cause a problem where the partition values are joined in (i.e. not materialized in the data like converted Hive tables)? I assume we don't have a way to correct for that case since the recorded transform is incorrect and we cannot materialize the correct data to filter later?~~ Nevermind, they can't really have transforms in the partitions anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
