hcrosse opened a new issue, #4276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/4276

   ### Apache Iceberg version
   
   0.12.0 (latest release)
   
   ### Please describe the bug 🐞
   
   For a table identity-partitioned on a nullable string column `p`, filtering 
with `p != 'a'` gives `scan.count() == 9` but `len(scan.to_arrow()) == 4`. The 
table has 3 rows with `p = 'a'`, 4 with `p = 'b'`, and 5 with `p = NULL`. 
`count()` includes the NULL rows, while `to_arrow()` excludes them. 
`to_arrow_batch_reader()` also returns 4 rows.
   
   I reproduced this on PyIceberg 0.12.0 and main at 
`e3564a54c10960307147377c578680276865ed18`, with PyArrow 26.0.1 on Linux/amd64.
   
   Install `pyiceberg[pyarrow,sql-sqlite]==0.12.0` and `pyarrow==26.0.1`. The 
reproduction uses an in-process SQLite catalog and a temporary warehouse:
   
   ```python
   import tempfile
   import pyarrow as pa
   from pyiceberg.catalog.sql import SqlCatalog
   from pyiceberg.expressions import NotEqualTo
   from pyiceberg.partitioning import PartitionField, PartitionSpec
   from pyiceberg.schema import Schema
   from pyiceberg.transforms import IdentityTransform
   from pyiceberg.types import LongType, NestedField, StringType
   
   warehouse = tempfile.mkdtemp()
   catalog = SqlCatalog(
       "default", uri=f"sqlite:///{warehouse}/catalog.db", 
warehouse=f"file://{warehouse}"
   )
   catalog.create_namespace("ns")
   schema = Schema(
       NestedField(1, "id", LongType(), required=False),
       NestedField(2, "p", StringType(), required=False),
       NestedField(3, "v", LongType(), required=False),
   )
   spec = PartitionSpec(
       PartitionField(source_id=2, field_id=1000, 
transform=IdentityTransform(), name="p")
   )
   table = catalog.create_table("ns.t", schema=schema, partition_spec=spec)
   table.append(
       pa.table(
           {
               "id": list(range(1, 13)),
               "p": ["a"] * 3 + ["b"] * 4 + [None] * 5,
               "v": [1, 2, None, 1, 2, None, 3, 1, None, 2, 3, None],
           },
           schema=pa.schema([("id", pa.int64()), ("p", pa.string()), ("v", 
pa.int64())]),
       )
   )
   for field, value in [("p", "a"), ("v", 1)]:
       scan = table.scan(row_filter=NotEqualTo(field, value))
       print(
           f"{field}: count()={scan.count()} to_arrow()={len(scan.to_arrow())} 
batch_reader={len(scan.to_arrow_batch_reader().read_all())}"
       )
   ```
   
   Output on both 0.12.0 and main at `e3564a54`:
   
   ```text
   p: count()=9 to_arrow()=4 batch_reader=4
   v: count()=5 to_arrow()=5 batch_reader=5
   ```
   
   The NULL-partition task has `residual=AlwaysTrue()` because the [residual 
evaluator compares `None != 
'a'`](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/e3564a54c10960307147377c578680276865ed18/pyiceberg/expressions/visitors.py#L1927-L1931),
 so [`count()` adds the file's `record_count` of 5 without reading the 
file](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/e3564a54c10960307147377c578680276865ed18/pyiceberg/table/__init__.py#L2553-L2578).
 `to_arrow()` does not use the residual: it [passes the scan's full row filter 
to 
`ArrowScan`](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/e3564a54c10960307147377c578680276865ed18/pyiceberg/table/__init__.py#L2378-L2392)
 and [re-applies that filter to each 
file](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/e3564a54c10960307147377c578680276865ed18/pyiceberg/io/pyarrow.py#L1738-L1755).
 Arrow evaluates `NULL != 'a'` to null, and the scanner drops those rows.
   
   Two null conventions are involved. [PyIceberg's row 
evaluator](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/e3564a54c10960307147377c578680276865ed18/pyiceberg/expressions/visitors.py#L501-L502),
 Java's 
[`Evaluator.notEq`](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/ae869756da0f30a4bf67723351c8de2a2a8b924b/api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/expressions/Evaluator.java#L128-L138),
 and Java's 
[`ResidualEvaluator.notEq`](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/ae869756da0f30a4bf67723351c8de2a2a8b924b/api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/expressions/ResidualEvaluator.java#L195-L198)
 treat NULL as matching `!=`, agreeing with `count()` here. Java uses a 
[nulls-first string 
comparator](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/ae869756da0f30a4bf67723351c8de2a2a8b924b/api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/expressions/Literals.java#L540-L542).
 Arrow treats NULL as not matching, agreeing with `to_arrow()`. When [`count()` 
must read a file](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/e3564a54c1096
 0307147377c578680276865ed18/pyiceberg/table/__init__.py#L2569-L2577), it 
follows Arrow too: for the non-partition column `v`, both methods return 5 for 
`NotEqualTo("v", 1)`, while the row evaluator matches 9.
   
   `Not(EqualTo("p", "a"))` and `NotStartsWith("p", "a")` also give 9 and 4. A 
two-value `NotIn("p", {"a", "c"})` returns 9 from both methods, because Arrow's 
`~isin` keeps NULL rows. The table in 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/3918 shows the same difference.
   
   Expected: `count()` returns `len(to_arrow())` for the same scan. Whether 
NULL rows match `!=` is the choice left open in 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/3918. That draft PR described the 
two conventions and their implications for `delete()` and `overwrite()`, and it 
was closed as stale.
   
   Related:
   
   - https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/3498 covers other residual 
and evaluator null cases, rather than this `count()` versus `to_arrow()` 
mismatch.
   - The open https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/4219 addresses 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/4184 by making `delete()` 
remove exactly the rows returned by `scan(row_filter=f)`, including `!=` on a 
column containing NULL. That ties `delete()` to Arrow's convention.
   - https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/4197 compares the same 
read paths for an expired snapshot ID, rather than a nullable partition filter. 
The merged https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/4218 made `count()` 
raise like `to_arrow()` for that case.
   
   ### Willingness to contribute
   
   - [ ] I can contribute a fix for this bug independently
   - [x] I would be willing to contribute a fix for this bug with guidance from 
the Iceberg community
   - [ ] I cannot contribute a fix for this bug at this time
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to