kbendick commented on issue #2607: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/2607#issuecomment-845429034
> > I'm much less familiar with the Hive codebase, but I imagine the same issue would also come up? > > Yes this will be definitely a problem for Hive as well. > > > When looking at this, I too was thinking that it would be anything from `hadoop.*`, as Russell mentioned. This way it's in line with the SparkConf. > > That would look quite awkward for a Hive user. It would be strange that a config starting with hadoop will be put to the HiveConf. Ok. I somewhat pictured that. Given that this will be a problem for several people, another idea that I've had floating around in my head (that might not be a good one so feel free to say so) would be to have possibly multiple hive-site.xml / whatever hive conf files and have THOSE be pointed to as table properties? Admittedly even just typing it out, I don't love it. But I'd be curious to hear what you think (and why it's as bad of an idea as I suspect it is). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
