andersonm-ibm commented on pull request #4080: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4080#issuecomment-1034656040
> @andersonm-ibm Please help me understand #3470 why not use parquet KMSClient here but wrap one myself. org.apache.parquet.crypto.keytools.KmsClient thanks~ If I understand correctly your question, you're asking why do we have a separate KmsClient interface in Iceberg, different from the one defined in parquet. Then @ggershinsky would be the best person to answer you. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
