ggershinsky commented on pull request #4080: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4080#issuecomment-1034905316
> why do we have a separate KmsClient interface in Iceberg, different from the one defined in parquet. We build a general key management layer in Iceberg encryption, that will work for all Iceberg data formats, so it should not depend on parquet. Also, this KmsClient is cleaner and more intuitive than what we have in parquet-mr. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
