[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15356931#comment-15356931
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-3207:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user f7753 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/842

    IGNITE-3207 Rename IgniteConfiguration.gridName

    - Deprecate IgniteConfiguration.gridName
    - Add IgniteConfiguration.localInstanceName
    - Rename related parameters in Ignition class (and other places, if present)
    - Update Javadoc: clearly state that this name only works locally and has 
no effect on topology.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/f7753/ignite ignite-3207

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/842.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #842
    
----

----


> Rename IgniteConfiguration.gridName
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-3207
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3207
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: general
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.4
>            Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
>            Assignee: Biao Ma
>             Fix For: 1.7
>
>
> We have got a TON of questions on gridName property. Everyone thinks that 
> clusters are formed based on the gridName, that is, nodes with the same grid 
> name will join one cluster, and nodes with a different name will be in a 
> separate cluster.
> Let's do the following:
> * Deprecate IgniteConfiguration.gridName
> * Add IgniteConfiguration.localInstanceName
> * Rename related parameters in Ignition class (and other places, if present)
> * Update Javadoc: clearly state that this name only works locally and has no 
> effect on topology.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to