[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-26819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18037624#comment-18037624
 ] 

Kirill Tkalenko commented on IGNITE-26819:
------------------------------------------

Looks good.

> Write intent switch with enabled colocation fails after table drop
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-26819
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-26819
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Roman Puchkovskiy
>            Assignee: Roman Puchkovskiy
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Here is the scenario (when colocation is enabled):
>  # A transaction writing to table T is committed
>  # A command S to switch its write intents gets put to node A’s log, but it 
> is not applied on A yet
>  # Table T is dropped
>  # Command S is tried to be executed on A
>  # The following is written to the log
>  
>  
> {noformat}
> 2025-10-21 13:26:13:636 +0000 
> [INFO][%cac-dpd-cde-gg-aks-dev-0%partition-operations-6][WriteIntentSwitchProcessor]
>  Failed to switch write intents for Tx 
> [txId=0199eefd-45e2-00ef-399b-327000000001].
> 2025-10-21 13:26:13:636 +0000 
> [WARNING][%cac-dpd-cde-gg-aks-dev-0%partition-operations-6][TxCleanupRequestHandler]
>  Second cleanup attempt failed (the transaction outcome is not affected) 
> [txId=0199eefd-45e2-00ef-399b-327000000001]
> java.util.concurrent.CompletionException: 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.schemacompat.IncompatibleSchemaVersionException:
>  IGN-TX-11 Table was dropped [tableId=1022] TraceId:9807e086
>       at 
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.encodeThrowable(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniRunNow(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniRunStage(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.thenRun(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.TableAwareReplicaRequestPreProcessor.preProcessTableAwareRequest(TableAwareReplicaRequestPreProcessor.java:124)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.handlers.WriteIntentSwitchRequestHandler.invokeTableWriteIntentSwitchReplicaRequest(WriteIntentSwitchRequestHandler.java:162)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.handlers.WriteIntentSwitchRequestHandler.lambda$handle$0(WriteIntentSwitchRequestHandler.java:116)
>       at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at java.base/java.util.Iterator.forEachRemaining(Unknown Source)
>       at 
> java.base/java.util.Spliterators$IteratorSpliterator.forEachRemaining(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(Unknown Source)
>       at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(Unknown Source)
>       at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(Unknown Source)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.handlers.WriteIntentSwitchRequestHandler.handle(WriteIntentSwitchRequestHandler.java:117)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.ZonePartitionReplicaListener.processRequest(ZonePartitionReplicaListener.java:225)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.ZonePartitionReplicaListener.lambda$invoke$0(ZonePartitionReplicaListener.java:201)
>       at 
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniComposeStage(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.thenCompose(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.ZonePartitionReplicaListener.invoke(ZonePartitionReplicaListener.java:201)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.replicator.ZonePartitionReplicaImpl.processRequest(ZonePartitionReplicaImpl.java:65)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.replicator.ReplicaManager.handleReplicaRequest(ReplicaManager.java:391)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.replicator.ReplicaManager.lambda$onReplicaMessageReceived$0(ReplicaManager.java:322)
>       at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown 
> Source)
>       at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> Caused by: 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.schemacompat.IncompatibleSchemaVersionException:
>  IGN-TX-11 Table was dropped [tableId=1022] TraceId:9807e086
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.schemacompat.IncompatibleSchemaVersionException.tableDropped(IncompatibleSchemaVersionException.java:68)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.schemacompat.SchemaCompatibilityValidator.failIfTableDoesNotExistAt(SchemaCompatibilityValidator.java:266)
>       at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.partition.replicator.TableAwareReplicaRequestPreProcessor.lambda$preProcessTableAwareRequest$0(TableAwareReplicaRequestPreProcessor.java:108)
>       ... 26 more
> {noformat}
>  
>  
> This doesn't seem to break any functionality, but it clutters the logs.
> Probably we should not verify schema compatibility for write intent switch 
> requests.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to