[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15490803#comment-15490803
 ] 

Andrey Martianov commented on IGNITE-3621:
------------------------------------------

I suggest we should keep separate TtlManager-s for each cache (in order to 
manage queues of pending entries of different caches separately) but extract 
CleanupWorker and related logic in shared component.
Working this way.

> Make GridCacheTtlManager singleton
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-3621
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3621
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cache
>    Affects Versions: 1.6
>            Reporter: Eduard Shangareev
>            Assignee: Andrey Martianov
>              Labels: performance
>
> Now every cache has own TTL manager, which creates CleanupWorker = new extra 
> thread. This can cause to extra hundreds of threads (redundant context 
> switches = performance penalty).
> Also, under IGNITE-3513 every put can enter critical section to notify 
> worker. Obviously, it is not good from performance point of view.
> So, my proposal is next:
> 1. Expiration should be done on every cache action (on exit thread which 
> updates cache should invoke {{expire}}).
> 2. TtlManager will exist only in one instance.
> 3. CleanupWorker will be the only backup if there is no cache activity. It 
> will wake up with some period to check for work (500 ms, for example).
> Moreover, now we keep on-heap pending entries even if a cache is kept 
> off-head. At least, this issue needs discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to