[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16686475#comment-16686475
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-10058:
-----------------------------------------
GitHub user xtern opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5394
IGNITE-10058
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/xtern/ignite IGNITE-10058
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5394.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #5394
----
commit 0acea8d6473e97ef558ec30e4f112c9df2406a40
Author: pereslegin-pa <xxtern@...>
Date: 2018-11-14T12:56:54Z
IGNITE-10058 Fix draft.
----
> resetLostPartitions() leaves an additional copy of a partition in the cluster
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-10058
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10058
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Stanislav Lukyanov
> Assignee: Pavel Pereslegin
> Priority: Major
>
> If there are several copies of a LOST partition, resetLostPartitions() will
> leave all of them in the cluster as OWNING.
> Scenario:
> 1) Start 4 nodes, a cache with backups=0 and READ_WRITE_SAFE, fill the cache
> 2) Stop one node - some partitions are recreated on the remaining nodes as
> LOST
> 3) Start one node - the LOST partitions are being rebalanced to the new node
> from the existing ones
> 4) Wait for rebalance to complete
> 5) Call resetLostPartitions()
> After that the partitions that were LOST become OWNING on all nodes that had
> them. Eviction of these partitions doesn't start.
> Need to correctly evict additional copies of LOST partitions either after
> rebalance on step 4 or after resetLostPartitions() call on step 5.
> Current resetLostPartitions() implementation does call checkEvictions(), but
> the ready affinity assignment contains several nodes per partition for some
> reason.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
