[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13670606#comment-13670606
]
Andrew Phillips commented on JCLOUDS-104:
-----------------------------------------
This will certainly cause some discussion as we've gone in exactly the
*opposite* direction recently with the simpler projects, see e.g.:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/commit/1ddd05922575afd280eeb307beff36a6fa27d376
Could you describe the challenges of not having a project POM in a little more
detail?
Thanks!
> Change labs/cli/karaf to have their own parent POMs separate from the
> top-level POM
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCLOUDS-104
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-104
> Project: jclouds
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jclouds-cli, jclouds-karaf, jclouds-labs,
> jclouds-labs-aws, jclouds-labs-google, jclouds-labs-openstack
> Reporter: Andrew Bayer
> Assignee: Andrew Bayer
> Fix For: 1.7.0, 1.5.11, 1.6.2
>
>
> Currently, jclouds and jclouds-chef each have a parent POM,
> (repo)/project/pom.xml, which all the other POMs, including the top-level
> POM, in the project inherit from. jclouds-labs*, jclouds-cli and
> jclouds-karaf all just have the top-level POM, and everything else inherits
> from that top-level POM. That makes some processes (like aggregate javadoc
> and assemblies) done in the top-level POM a bit problematic for the first
> build of a new version (i.e., in releases). It'd be nice if these projects
> separated out the parent and top-level POM functionality as well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
