[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13699630#comment-13699630
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-104:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit d9acba69e0cff4128f412213e91b8ce8cb7d13a7 in branch refs/heads/master 
from [~zack-s]
[ 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-jclouds-labs-openstack.git;h=d9acba6
 ]

Change labs to have their own parent POMs
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-104

                
> Change labs/cli/karaf to have their own parent POMs separate from the 
> top-level POM
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCLOUDS-104
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-104
>             Project: jclouds
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jclouds-cli, jclouds-karaf, jclouds-labs, 
> jclouds-labs-aws, jclouds-labs-google, jclouds-labs-openstack
>            Reporter: Andrew Bayer
>            Assignee: Andrew Bayer
>             Fix For: 1.7.0, 1.5.11, 1.6.2
>
>
> Currently, jclouds and jclouds-chef each have a parent POM, 
> (repo)/project/pom.xml, which all the other POMs, including the top-level 
> POM, in the project inherit from. jclouds-labs*, jclouds-cli and 
> jclouds-karaf all just have the top-level POM, and everything else inherits 
> from that top-level POM. That makes some processes (like aggregate javadoc 
> and assemblies) done in the top-level POM a bit problematic for the first 
> build of a new version (i.e., in releases). It'd be nice if these projects 
> separated out the parent and top-level POM functionality as well.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to