https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305

--- Comment #20 from Wyatt Epp <j...@cas.org> ---
(In reply to Felix Schumacher from comment #19)
>
> @Wyatt
> Was there any reason to use a static variable? Can you check, if this patch
> helps you?

That's just how the original patch posted by the reporter did things-- all I
did was fix up his patch to apply clean on the 3.0 source tree.

If I had to guess it's just because he thought it was more natural to set
things up by calling a static method.  (I happen to disagree.)  I'm pretty sure
it'll be fine if it's not static.

> @Team
> I think it is safe to include this in 3.1, what do you think?

We would appreciate it greatly.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to