[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13485673#comment-13485673
 ] 

Achim Nierbeck commented on KARAF-1966:
---------------------------------------

Hi Brian, 

well I know that it's always a balance, but to be honest such changes, as going 
for a 3.0.0 Pax-Web with CDI support (forget about Tomcat right now)
and such is best taken by a 3.0 a major change then any other version. 

People are already requesting 2.1.x (Pax-Web) for the 2.3.x karaf line. 
So I really don't want people to miss this part for the 3.0 of Karaf since the 
alternative would be to wait for a 4 or 3.x maybe and that one wasn't really 
thought of yet. So even since it failed for you, it's better to fail now then 
later on, when everything is "released". 
And TBH since I know what stuff was changed I'm not sure a 2.1.1 of Pax-Web 
wouldn't be affected either. 
So if you could give me a detailed description on what fails I can work a iTest 
out of it and fix it. 
                
> Upgrade to Pax Web 3.0
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: KARAF-1966
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1966
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
>          Components: karaf-webcontainer
>            Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> In order to get all bug fixes, and especially the great work by Achim about 
> Tomcat support, we are going to update to Pax-Web 3.0 in Karaf 3.0.0.
> A first update to SNAPSHOT (for testing purpose) would be interesting.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to