[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16987533#comment-16987533
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on SOLR-13993:
------------------------------------

I think I can nuke the TODOs if we figure out how to plugin to velocity 
classloading mechanism (i think its resourceloader api), sorry i dont know it, 
i have to study their docs first. current patch doesn't try to do that, its 
just a brute approach: so there is no separation of "what the engine can do" vs 
"what the user template can do", hence bogus permissions we don't want.

> sandbox velocity template render
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-13993
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13993
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: SOLR-13993.patch, SOLR-13993.patch, SOLR-13993.patch
>
>
> This thing seems dangerous :)
> Making the whole solr secure is a whole nother thing: (see e.g. SOLR-13991 
> and we haven't even gotten started). Its pretty difficult to convert whole 
> large app to work securely. It is going to take time.
> In the meantime, if we have things that might do something dangerous, and 
> security manager is enabled, we can put them into a special little sandbox 
> and throw away the key: for example we can intentionally discard permissions 
> we don't need so they can't launch stuff, if we really don't trust them, we 
> can start filtering what classes classloader will load.
> This isn't that crazy at all to do, e.g. your web browser does similar tricks 
> to try to sandbox specific parts that might do something unexpected and cause 
> security issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to