issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] Seal the BitSet class [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add remaining bulk float32 off-heap scoring similarities [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add remaining bulk float32 off-heap scoring similarities [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add remaining bulk float32 off-heap scoring similarities [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add remaining bulk float32 off-heap scoring similarities [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add remaining bulk float32 off-heap scoring similarities [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add remaining bulk float32 off-heap scoring similarities [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add remaining bulk float32 off-heap scoring similarities [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add remaining bulk float32 off-heap scoring similarities [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add minor utility method VectorUtil::normalizeToUnitInterval [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add minor utility method VectorUtil::normalizeToUnitInterval [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add minor utility method VectorUtil::normalizeToUnitInterval [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add some basic tests and infra to allow to write small sanity tests for benchmarks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add some basic tests and infra to allow to write small sanity tests for benchmarks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add some basic tests and infra to allow to write small sanity tests for benchmarks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add some basic tests and infra to allow to write small sanity tests for benchmarks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add some basic tests and infra to allow to write small sanity tests for benchmarks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add some basic tests and infra to allow to write small sanity tests for benchmarks [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestParentBlockJoinByteKnnVectorQuery.testTimeout fails: AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0> [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestParentBlockJoinByteKnnVectorQuery.testTimeout fails: AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0> [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Cut over HNSW's neighbor lists to group-varint? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Removing unused parameter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Removing unused parameter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Removing unused parameter in MemorySegmentIndexInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Removing unused parameter in MemorySegmentIndexInput [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport: Remove full integrity check from SortingStoredFieldsConsumer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport: Remove full integrity check from SortingStoredFieldsConsumer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.12.1 to 0.12.7 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.12.1 to 0.12.7 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.6.1 to 2.7.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.6.1 to 2.7.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.6.1 to 2.7.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump pygithub from 2.6.1 to 2.7.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.29.5 to 1.31.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.29.5 to 1.31.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.29.5 to 1.31.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.75 to 0.77 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.75 to 0.77 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.75 to 0.77 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize prefix sum computation in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader; fixes #15024 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] RamUsageEstimator.sizeOf(Query, long) does not match RamUsageTester.ramUsed(obj) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] flush segments in addIndexes, not in addIndexesReaderMerge; fixes #14994 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] flush segments in addIndexes, not in addIndexesReaderMerge; fixes #14994 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] flush segments in addIndexes, not in addIndexesReaderMerge; fixes #14994 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Improve prefix sum in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve prefix sum in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve prefix sum in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve prefix sum in Lucene99HnswVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Try encoding very frequent terms using a dense bitmap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Try encoding very frequent terms using a dense bitmap [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add ImpactRangeQuery for Impact-Based Document Range Prioritization [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ImpactRangeQuery for Impact-Based Document Range Prioritization [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ImpactRangeQuery for Impact-Based Document Range Prioritization [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ImpactRangeQuery for Impact-Based Document Range Prioritization [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ImpactRangeQuery for Impact-Based Document Range Prioritization [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove unused `nonZeroLevelSize` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused `nonZeroLevelSize` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused `nonZeroLevelSize` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused `nonZeroLevelSize` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Return the max score from `RandomVectorScorer.bulkScore` [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Lucene 9.11: Make AbstractKnnVectorQuery.searchLeaf() overridable to enable custom KNN instrumentation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene 9.11: Make AbstractKnnVectorQuery.searchLeaf() overridable to enable custom KNN instrumentation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene 9.11: Make AbstractKnnVectorQuery.searchLeaf() overridable to enable custom KNN instrumentation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene 9.11: Make AbstractKnnVectorQuery.searchLeaf() overridable to enable custom KNN instrumentation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene 9.11: Make AbstractKnnVectorQuery.searchLeaf() overridable to enable custom KNN instrumentation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene 9.11: Make AbstractKnnVectorQuery.searchLeaf() overridable to enable custom KNN instrumentation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene 9.11: Make AbstractKnnVectorQuery.searchLeaf() overridable to enable custom KNN instrumentation [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Don't revisit knn query results unless optimistic collection was used… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't revisit knn query results unless optimistic collection was used… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't revisit knn query results unless optimistic collection was used… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't revisit knn query results unless optimistic collection was used… [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] BytesRefIntMap's INIT_RAM_BYTES uses shallowSizeof() instead of shallowSizeOfInstance() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BytesRefIntMap's INIT_RAM_BYTES uses shallowSizeof() instead of shallowSizeOfInstance() [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Faceting + Data Sketches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Faceting + Data Sketches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Faceting + Data Sketches [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Parent block join knn vector query test case test random 10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Parent block join knn vector query test case test random 10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Parent block join knn vector query test case test random 10x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Parent block join knn vector query test case.test random [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Parent block join knn vector query test case.test random [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add AcceptDocs interface for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs interface for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.27 to 4.0.28 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.27 to 4.0.28 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.41.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.41.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.27.1 to 1.28.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.27.1 to 1.28.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.27.1 to 1.28.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.27.1 to 1.28.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.27.1 to 1.28.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools from 2.5.4 to 2.5.5 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools from 2.5.4 to 2.5.5 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages