[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17018437#comment-17018437
 ] 

Chris M. Hostetter commented on SOLR-11746:
-------------------------------------------

bq.  I think it would be nice to have a separate patch/issue to add something 
like a hasNorms() functionality to SchemaField

Sounds like a good idea ... but I think it would probably be cleaner if 
{{PointField.init(...)}} & {{PointField.checkSchemaField(...)}} would check for 
types/fields using {{omitNorm==false}} and if found explicitly fail with an 
error that {{PointFields don't support 'omitNorms=false'}}....  (...unless 
{{TEST_HACK_IGNORE_USELESS_TRIEFIELD_ARGS == true}} -- similar to how 
precisionStep is silently ignored at a 'type' level -- so that we could 
continue to randomize either point fields or trie fields in the same test 
schema)

that way -- IIUC -- your proposed {{SchemaField.hasNorms()}} would just be {{! 
SchemaField.omitNorms()}}

> numeric fields need better error handling for prefix/wildcard syntax -- 
> consider uniform support for "foo:* == foo:[* TO *]"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11746
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11746
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 7.0
>            Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter
>            Assignee: Houston Putman
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: master (9.0), 8.5
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-11746.patch, SOLR-11746.patch, SOLR-11746.patch, 
> SOLR-11746.patch, SOLR-11746.patch, SOLR-11746.patch, SOLR-11746.patch
>
>
> On the solr-user mailing list, Torsten Krah pointed out that with Trie 
> numeric fields, query syntax such as {{foo_d:\*}} has been functionality 
> equivilent to {{foo_d:\[\* TO \*]}} and asked why this was not also supported 
> for Point based numeric fields.
> The fact that this type of syntax works (for {{indexed="true"}} Trie fields) 
> appears to have been an (untested, undocumented) fluke of Trie fields given 
> that they use indexed terms for the (encoded) numeric terms and inherit the 
> default implementation of {{FieldType.getPrefixQuery}} which produces a 
> prefix query against the {{""}} (empty string) term.  
> (Note that this syntax has aparently _*never*_ worked for Trie fields with 
> {{indexed="false" docValues="true"}} )
> In general, we should assess the behavior users attempt a prefix/wildcard 
> syntax query against numeric fields, as currently the behavior is largely 
> non-sensical:  prefix/wildcard syntax frequently match no docs w/o any sort 
> of error, and the aformentioned {{numeric_field:*}} behaves inconsistently 
> between points/trie fields and between indexed/docValued trie fields.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to