issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement off-heap quantized scoring [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java, batch 1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java, batch 1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java, batch 1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java, batch 1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java, batch 1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java, batch 1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java, batch 1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle plugins to java, batch 1 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Move index of numbers from BKD into DocValuesSkipper? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [Build] [DO NOT MERGE YET] Refactor validation-jar checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Build] [DO NOT MERGE YET] Refactor validation-jar checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Build] [DO NOT MERGE YET] Refactor validation-jar checks [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add refinement of quantized vector scores with fp distance calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add refinement of quantized vector scores with fp distance calculations [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(java): fix typos [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Ensure vector queries handle advanceShallow correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure vector queries handle advanceShallow correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure vector queries handle advanceShallow correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure vector queries handle advanceShallow correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure vector queries handle advanceShallow correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure vector queries handle advanceShallow correctly [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.39.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.39.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.39.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.39.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.39.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Feature/scalar quantized off heap scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/scalar quantized off heap scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/scalar quantized off heap scoring [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Correct tests.seed to be reported on failures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct tests.seed to be reported on failures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct tests.seed to be reported on failures [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] tests.seed is no longer reported on failures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] tests.seed is no longer reported on failures [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Should we use the new `expectedVisitedNodes` heuristic to speed up filtered vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use the new `expectedVisitedNodes` estimator to speed up filtered vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use the new `expectedVisitedNodes` estimator to speed up filtered vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use the new `expectedVisitedNodes` estimator to speed up filtered vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use the new `expectedVisitedNodes` estimator to speed up filtered vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format from 1.23.0 to 1.27.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format from 1.23.0 to 1.27.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add more information to IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add more information to IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: enable gh annotations with ast-grep [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: enable gh annotations with ast-grep [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: enable gh annotations with ast-grep [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: enable gh annotations with ast-grep [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make it possible to extend PatienceKnnQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend PatienceKnnQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend PatienceKnnQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend PatienceKnnQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend PatienceKnnQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend Patience/Seeded knn queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend Patience/Seeded knn queries [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] A workflow "bot" that would apply formatting fixes and create a PR against a PR? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] A workflow "bot" that would apply formatting fixes and create a PR against a PR? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] A workflow "bot" that would apply formatting fixes and create a PR against a PR? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] A workflow "bot" that would apply formatting fixes and create a PR against a PR? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] A workflow "bot" that would apply formatting fixes and create a PR against a PR? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] A workflow "bot" that would apply formatting fixes and create a PR against a PR? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Minor] Release email URLs not clickable in some email clients [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Minor] Release email URLs not clickable in some email clients [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Minor] Release email URLs not clickable in some email clients [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Minor] Release email URLs not clickable in some email clients [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize `CombinedFieldQuery` by `nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `CombinedFieldQuery` by `nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages