dweiss commented on a change in pull request #1905:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1905#discussion_r492507019
##########
File path: lucene/build.gradle
##########
@@ -15,8 +15,56 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
+// Should we do this as :lucene:packaging similar to how Solr does it?
Review comment:
Yes, please move it to :lucene:packaging. It makes things much cleaner
in the long run.
##########
File path: lucene/build.gradle
##########
@@ -15,8 +15,56 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
+// Should we do this as :lucene:packaging similar to how Solr does it?
+// Or is this fine here?
+
+plugins {
+ id 'distribution'
+}
+
description = 'Parent project for Apache Lucene Core'
subprojects {
group "org.apache.lucene"
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}
+
+distributions {
+ main {
+ // This is empirically wrong, but it is mostly a copy from `ant
package-zip`
Review comment:
This is wrong. It should rely on published artifacts from other
subprojects (set up proper dependencies) and assemble them in the right way
into the distribution layout.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
