[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17286226#comment-17286226
 ] 

Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-9480:
-------------------------------------

As per a discussion with Robert Muir on the dev list, I'm going to see if I can 
come up with a first pass for optimizing DataInput#skipBytes(). It won't be as 
aggressive as collapsing DataInput and IndexInput to start, but will be aimed 
at solving two issues: 1) avoiding the unnecessary copying of bytes around in 
order to skip, and 2) avoiding unnecessary garbage creation from each DataInput 
instance allocating its own skip buffer byte[].

> investigate slow DataInput.skipBytes
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9480
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9480
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently DataInput has skipBytes(), but IndexInput also adds seek(). 
> There isn't a clear reason about the differences in the two methods: why 
> would you choose one over the other?
> It causes some performance issues: for example the default implementation 
> actually reads bytes into a byte array and throws everything away. This is 
> really silly for MMapDirectory: skipping bytes should only be a glorified 
> {{+=}}. 
> So when I look at latest LUCENE-9447 patch, I can't help but think a ton of 
> waste is happening:
> * Maybe skipBytes() is only used because the stored fields compressor 
> interface happens to take DataInput? Should it take IndexInput instead?
> * Should skipBytes() be overridden by MMapDirectory rather than delegating to 
> super? doing real reads and byte array copies isn't free. It should be a 
> {{+=}} with single bounds check.
> * Should we revisit having DataInput vs IndexInput at all? Maybe they should 
> be collapsed into one thing?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to