[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17337741#comment-17337741
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9946:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
I was aiming for consistency with the approach taken in LongValueFacetCounts,
but if there's a better way to do this, I'm all for it (and maybe it's an
opportunity to improve on LongValueFacetCounts as well).
{quote}
I see, it is a pre-existing condition with {{LongValueFacetCounts}}.
I didn't mean to increase scope of this issue, we can add the {{LongRange}} and
{{DoubleRange}} and then fix the public api of all 3 classes in a separate
issue. Or fix it here, or first in a separate issue, doesn't matter. I would
just open JIRA issues so we don't forget.
SortedSetDocValuesFacetCounts is also bad (consistency-wise): this only
supports {{SORTED_SET}} fields but not {{SORTED}}. It's a one-liner to change
{{reader.getSortedSetDocValues()}} to {{DocValues.getSortedSet()}} helper
method, so that single-valued fields work too. I'd then consider renaming
{{SortedSetDocValuesFacetCounts}} to something like
{{StringDocValuesFacetCounts}} as it supports {{SORTED}} type too.
If such single-valued optimizations really help for numerics (?), maybe we
should look into also applying them to {{SortedSetDocValuesFacetCounts}} too
(the doc ordinals are basically just a numeric dv field after all)
> Support multi-value fields in range facet counting
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9946
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9946
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/facet
> Affects Versions: main (9.0)
> Reporter: Greg Miller
> Priority: Minor
>
> The {{RangeFacetCounts}} implementations ({{LongRangeFacetCounts}} and
> {{DoubleRangeFacetCount}}) only work on single-valued fields today. In
> contrast, the more recently added {{LongValueFacetCounts}} implementation
> supports both single- and multi-valued fields (LUCENE-7927). I'd like to
> extend multi-value support to both of the {{LongRangeFacetCounts}}
> implementations as well.
> Looking through the implementations, I can't think of a good reason to _not_
> support this, but maybe I'm overlooking something?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
